Developing the LO required a peer-review in which a classmate and I worked together by critiquing each other’s work.

I always felt lucky to work with high calibre individuals during the Program but I was nervous when I had to present the LO to my classmate for peer-review. Her comments were significant for me because I found out that I needed to improve the readability of my textual content (she recommended reducing the length of my sentences and the number of multi-syllabic words). On the other hand she was impressed with my use of media and organized, coherent and minimalistic approach to presentation. She also provided positive comments on the alignment of objectives with exercises and practical skills. In the end, the symbiotic nature of the peer-review process was valuable for me as it required a solid understanding of instructional design when critiquing my partner’s work and it also provided me with opportunities to improve my LO.