Social Software in 6. Social Learning
Social Software
Video presentation: Dr Terry Anderson
I wasn't able to make the live meeting, on Oct 24, 2011 (link to video), but I did watched the 1:28 hour recorded lecture by Dr Terry Anderson. I'm curious what people thought about the LANDING (i.e. elgg) site? Do you think it's a good tool for a social learning environment? I went into the landing and "lurked" around as Terry put it. I'm not convinced it’s a robust social learning tool. It has a look and feel of a 10 year old system design. It has affordances, but at what cost? I haven't given it a fair trial yet, but so far the features seem to be comparable to E-Lab Portfolio (ie Mahara.) The idea of following a person’s blog, controlling personal data, banning objectionable material... are similar to joining a group in Mahara. Is it possible to use Mahara as a social learning environment? Can we multi-task or configure the current adopted systems to achieve the the social learning objective?
Terry's raised the point of critical mass as a key issue when adopting a disruptive technology in an educational institution. To me, it's like trying to start a fire in a wet field. If you start several small fires around a wet field nothing catches. But, if you focus all your energy on 1 spot then it’s easier for it to catch on. The Landing does have hundreds of subscribers, but as Terry showed the “tail” graph of user participation, it’s a problem. Most users are like me, “lurkers”. This could be, in part, to the fact that several courses require students to create an account for a mark. Those people have not bought into the idea. Maybe there is a reason for that! I’m not trying to be a naysayer, about social learning, just that the tool may not be the best selection for the job.
I’m installing elgg (the Landing software) at: elgg.rhyon.com to give it a fair evaluation. I found the technical support lacking compared to other systems I’ve installed. (ie Mahara, Moodle, Wordpress) After reading up on the tool, I found out that it’s not the most popular system on the market for social blogging. That title goes to Wordpress, (http://blog-software-review.toptenreviews.com/). I setup a Wordpress server to test out as a comparison at: wordpress.rhyon.com. There are over a million subscribers to this product. The added advantage is that Wordpress is portable, configurable and scalable. It can be adapted to work like a social learning environment. Giving it additional affordances and a universal appeal. Students can take their Wordpress site away with them and re-purpose it in the future. On the home page of elgg site, they only boast 7 high level institutions use their system. I think elgg is relatively simple but might not be the best choice for a social learning environment.
Just my thoughts.
Social software is one of the most well-known applications of Web 2.0 philosophy. Dr. Terry Anderson identifies social software as software that addresses social issues such as: meeting, building community, providing mentoring and personal learning assistance, working collaboratively on projects or problems, reducing communication errors and supporting complex group functions. Many of us belong to one or more public social software sites, such as myspace (http://www.myspace.com/) or facebook (http://www.facebook.com/).
Social software can also be used effectively within a distance education environment. In this unit we will examine social software, in particular the Elgg system as implemented on Athabasca Landing. Dr. Anderson will be a guest lecturer for this unit and will discuss his long-term vision for social software and Athabasca Landing at Athabasca University.
Reference: http://cde.lms.athabascau.ca/course/view.php?id=348